An SDP approach to multi-level crossing minimization

Chimani, Markus and Hungerländer, Philipp and Jünger, Michael and Mutzel, Petra (2011) An SDP approach to multi-level crossing minimization.
Published In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX 2011) SIAM March 2011, pp. 116-126.


We present an approach based on semidefinite programs (SDP) to tackle the multi-level crossing minimization prob- lem. Thereby, we are given a layered graph (i.e., the graph´s vertices are assigned to multiple parallel levels) and ask for an ordering of the nodes on their levels such that, when draw- ing the graph with straight lines, the resulting number of crossings is minimized. Solving this step is crucial in the probably most widely used graph drawing scheme, the so- called Sugiyama framework. The problem has received a lot of attention both in the field of heuristics and exact methods. For a long time, integer linear programming (ILP) approaches were the only exact algorithms applicable at least to small graphs. Recently, SDP formulations for the special case of two levels were proposed and dominated the ILP for dense instances. In this paper, we present a new SDP formulation for the general multi-level version that, for two-levels, is even stronger than the aforementioned specialized SDP. As a side- product, we also obtain an SDP-based heuristic which in practice always gives (near-)optimal solutions. We conduct a large set of experiments, both on random- ized and on real-world instances, and compare our approach to a state-of-the-art ILP-based branch-and-cut implementa- tion. The SDP clearly dominates for denser graphs, while the ILP approach is usually faster for sparse instances. However, even for such sparse graphs, the SDP solves more instances to optimality than the ILP. In fact, there is no single instance the ILP solved, which the SDP did not. Overall, our experi- ments reveal that for sparse graphs, one should usually try to find an optimal solution with the ILP first. If this approach does not solve the instance to optimality within reasonable time, the SDP still has a good chance to do so. Being able to solve larger real-world instances than reported before, we are also able to evaluate heuristics for this problem. In this paper we do so for the traditional barycenter-heuristic (showing that it leaves a large gap to the true optimum) and the state-of-the-art upward-planarization method (showing that it is usually close to the optimum).

Download: [img] PDF - Preprinted Version
Download (1754Kb) | Preview
Export as:
Editorial actions: View Item View Item (Login required)
Deposit Information:
ZAIK Number: zaik2011-616
Depositing User: Prof. Dr. Michael Jünger
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2011 00:00
Last Modified: 26 May 2014 13:47